Home Newsletters
Newsletters
Newsletters are published at regular intervals.  You can download them at the links below or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it and receive the latest news in your in-box.

CN's Intermodal Facility in down town Prince George PDF Print E-mail
Written by PACHA   
Thursday, 20 October 2011 19:49

While the recent announcement of the expansion of Prince Rupert's Container facility is a definite boon to BC's economy, we all must consider the repercussions of the increased traffic of the CN rail yard here in Prince George. 

We ask you to please think about the implications to the city's overloaded airshed, and also the long term increase in rail yard noise and how this will affect any future plans of improving Prince George's downtown core. Consider asking your local city councilors, MLA's and MP's:

How they feel this will impact the community beyond the obvious benefit to the economy?

How they plan to mitigate the increased burden of the diesel emissions and rail line cleaning\sweeping in an already compromised airshed?

Are there any plans in place to lower the excessive noise of an already busy railyard with sound barriers, or perhaps limitations for hours of operations?

Are there any plans to beautify the immediate surroundings of the railyards or keep it as the industrial waste land it is?

 

Dear Mayor Rogers and City Council Members,

Recently Premier Christy Clark announced a big expansion to the Asia Gateway, at the Ridley Port in Prince Rupert. Ms. Clark said by the end of this decade the Ridley port will be handling two million plus containers per year. Divided by 365 days, this equals to five and a half thousand containers per day. 

These containers will then be transported into and through Prince George. They will go through the CN rail yards on First avenue.

It is my understanding that CN was originally supposed to build their Intermodal in the BCR site, but unfortunately it was built on First Ave, right down town.  As twenty million dollars was spent to build this Intermodal downtown, I think it is highly unlikely CN will move it, to cope with this projected massive expansion in container traffic.

It is also my understanding, that CN is currently permitted to handle 700 containers per day and that they have now reached their capacity in this regard.

 If CN is going to handle 5,500 containers per day in the next few years, it will need to increase its space and capacity. The only logical place for CN to expand to, is for CN or some other partner company, to purchase the now completely closed Winton Global Mill lands, which is adjacent to the Intermodal and make a mega sized Intermodal.

It does not seem to me to be a co-incidence, that a delegation of Chinese officials from COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company),  were recently hosted in Prince George and were told that Prince George has much to offer them. COSCO already ships by rail, large quantities of containers through Prince Rupert and Prince George.

Just after the Chinese delegation left, the announcement came that Winton Global workers would get their final severance pay, as the Mill is never going to reopen.  

The massive increase in rail traffic from 700 to 5,500 containers per day, is going to create a significant air quality problem in the downtown, due to  the parallel increase in emissions from the locomotives; the back loaded trucks and fugitive dust particles resulting from same.

In addition, the downtown rail yards noise pollution, at all times of the night and day, is going to be deeply disturbing for downtown and Millar Addition citizens.

Such an increase in air and noise pollution will make living in the downtown area a horrible experience, thus potentially ending the dream of re-vitalizing the downtown core.  

The City of Prince George has no jurisdiction over CN, as it is a federally regulated.

The City of Prince George does however have the jurisdiction to controlling the re-zoning of certain properties within its borders, for example.....the Winton Global property downtown.

I am asking you all, to really consider the potential adverse air and noise quality consequences, when such an expansion in rail traffic occurs through the downtown, and ask how you as Mayor and City Councilors can prevent any more pollution occurring in our already overloaded air shed.

 yours sincerely,

 Marie Hay

President PACHA

People’s Action Committee for Healthy Air

Last Updated on Friday, 18 November 2011 08:04
 
President's November Report PDF Print E-mail
Written by PACHA   
Monday, 29 November 2010 15:15

November 2010 Presidents Report  PACHA
Hello fellow members, just as short note to keep you apprised of what is transpiring in the airshed. 

While it has seemed quiet lately on the airshed front, there has been some significant work done in the background to ensure improved air quality in Prince George for a longer term. Indeed the air has not been bad this fall thanks in part to some good weather as well as the upgrades made by industry over the past several years. 
PACHA has been working with PGAir to determine how Phase lll of the air quality plan will be rolled out and how the public and industry will be informed on their role and necessary improvements to make our air better. 
Recently PACHA had a meeting with CANFOR PULP CPLP to get an update on the projects that CPLP has been working on that will make significant improvements in our air quality.  In fact we came away from the meeting quite optimistic  with news that the first projects should be complete by July 2011.  An odor project at PG PULP that will reduce the odor that most people associate with Prince George by 60% ( We think that this is a significant number and hope that the anticipated results from modeling are correct).  In addition a big project at CPLP Northwood will reduce particulate and TRS (Smelly Sulphur) by between 50-60% from that mill and that project should be completed by the fall of 2011.  Finally, by 2012, another project is in the works which will reduce the particulate from PG pulp power boiler by 50% or 80 tonnes per year.  These projects will be good news stories for Prince George and we hope that they turn out as good as they sound. 

PACHA and BC Cancer Society plan to present the film Living Downstream (http://www.livingdownstream.com/trailer.php)

We hope to see you come out and will notify you as we get more details.
 
 
Yours for better Air 
 Dr Marie Hay

President PACHA - Peoples Action Committee for Healthy Air

www.pachapg.ca

Last Updated on Monday, 29 November 2010 17:21
 
Study links air pollution, breast cancer risk PDF Print E-mail
Written by PACHA   
Saturday, 09 October 2010 10:55

Study links air pollution, breast cancer risk
October 7, 2010

Incidence of the disease rose in areas with higher levels of traffic-related pollution, Montreal researchers say.

 
Traffic-related air pollution may put women at risk for breast cancer, according to a new study from Quebec. The study, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, looks at links between the risk of breast cancer, a leading cause of death from cancer in women, and traffic pollution. Researchers from McGill University and the Universite de Montreal charted incidences of breast cancer and compared them with pollution maps.
"We've been watching breast cancer rates go up for some time," study co-author Mark Goldberg, a researcher at McGill University Health Centre, said in a release Wednesday. "Nobody really knows why, and only about one-third of cases are attributable to known risk factors. Since no one had studied the connection between air pollution and breast cancer using detailed air pollution maps, we decided to investigate it."
Goldberg and his colleagues combined data from several studies. They created two air pollution maps that showed levels of nitrogen dioxide, a byproduct of vehicle traffic, in different parts of Montreal in 1996 and 10 years earlier in 1986. Then, the research team looked at the home addresses of women diagnosed with breast cancer in a 1996-97 study and charted that on to the air pollution maps.
The team says its results were "startling," and showed the incidence of breast cancer was increased in areas with higher levels of air pollution. "We found a link between post-menopausal breast cancer and exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NOsub2/sub), which is a marker for traffic-related air pollution," Goldberg said in the release. "Across Montreal, levels of NOsub2/sub varied between five parts per billion to over 30 parts per billion. We found that risk increased by about 25 per cent with every increase of NOsub2/sub of five parts per billion.
"Another way of saying this is that women living in the areas with the highest levels of pollution were almost twice as likely to develop breast cancer as those living in the least polluted areas." Goldberg warns, however, that the study must be interpreted with caution. "First of all, this doesn't mean NOsub2/sub causes breast cancer," he said. "This gas is not the only pollutant created by cars and trucks, but where it is present, so are the other gases, particles and compounds we associate with traffic -- some of which are known carcinogens."
Goldberg said the study can be subject to unknown variables and that some areas of uncertainty remain. "For example, we don't know how much the women in the study were exposed to pollution while at home or at work, because that would depend on their daily patterns of activity, how much time they spend outdoors and so on," Goldberg said.
"At the moment, we are not in a position to say with assurance that air pollution causes breast cancer. However, we can say that the possible link merits serious investigation," the team said in its release. Studies published in the U. S, also have shown possible links between cancer and air pollution. The study was funded by a research grant from the Canadian Cancer Society and another one from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Vancouver Sun, Thu Oct 7 2010, Page: B4, Section: Canada & World, Byline: Neil Haesler

Last Updated on Saturday, 09 October 2010 10:57
 
Presidents Report - June 2010 PDF Print E-mail

Greetings to all the 1208 members of PACHA. This is my first newsletter as your new President, and I feel very honoured to have been elected to this position. I do have some feelings of trepidation in taking over from Dave Fuller, who did such a fantastic job as your last President, and Betty Bekkering who was the inaugural  president of PACHA. Betty and Dave have left some very large shoes to fill! With their and your assistance, I hope to emulate their  awesome efforts to clean up our airshed.

OUR VISION:

Read more...
 
Presidents Report PACHA AGM 2010- PDF Print E-mail
Written by Dave Fuller   
Sunday, 18 April 2010 08:03

 

Speech given by Dave Fuller at AGM

The last year has been a big learning curve for PACHA and lots has happened. If you remember this time last year we had the candidates in the provincial election give their positions on air quality. After that and subsequent board meetings the board of Pacha decided not to get involved in the election process as we had in the municipal election as we believed that we could work with 4 or 5 of the candidates to get cleaner air for Prince George.

Since then we have had several meetings with Pat Bell and Shirley Bond our MLAs regarding issues around the airshed.

 

It was shortly after our last AGM that the now infamous report on odor came out at the PGAir meeting last

Last Updated on Sunday, 18 April 2010 08:04
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 4

Website By Stone Tools Consulting. Valid XHTML and CSS.